Nuclear Envelope

• D'Angelo, M. A. & Hetzer, M. W. 2006. The role of the nuclear envelope in cellular organization. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63: 316-332.
• Dultz, E. & Ellenberg, J. 2007. Nuclear envelope. Curr. Biol. 117: R154-R156.
• Mattaj, I. W. 2004. Sorting out the nuclear envelope from the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5: 1-5.
• Prunuske, A. J. & Ullman, K. S. 2006. The nuclear envelope: form and reformation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18: 108-116.Rose, A., Patel, S. & Meier, I. 2004. The plant nuclear envelope. Planta 218: 327-336.

• Becskei, A. & Mattaj, I. J. 2005. Quantitative models of nuclear transport. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17: 27-34.
• Burke, B. 2006. Nuclear pore complex models gel. Science 314: 766-767.
• Dasso, M. 2002. The Ran GTPase: Theme and Variations. Curr. Biol. 12: R502-R508.
• Goldfarb, D. S., Corbett, A. H., Mason, D. A., Harreman, M. T. & Adam, S. A. 2004. Importin a: a multipurpose nuclear-transport receptor. Trends Cell Biol. 14: 505-514.
• Johnson, H. M., Subramaniam, P. S., Olsnes, S. & Jans, D. A. 2004. Trafficking and singaling pathways of nuclear localizing protein ligands and their receotprs. BioEssays 26: 993-1004.
• Joseph, J. 2006. Ran at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 119: 3481-3484.
• Lim, R. Y. K. & Fahrenkrog, B. 2006. The nuclear pore complex up close. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18: 342-347.
• Mosammaparast, N. & Pemberton, L. F. 2004. Karyopherins: from nuclear-transport mediators to nuclear-function regulators. Trends Cell Biol. 14: 547-556.
• Pemberton, L. F. & Paschal, B. M. 2005. Mechanisms of receptor-mediated nuclear import and nuclear export. Traffic 6: 187-198.
• Poon, I. K. H. & Jans, D. A. 2005. Regulation of nuclear transport: Central role in development and transformation. Traffic 6: 173-186.
• Rabut, G., Lénárt, P. & Ellenberg, J. 2004. Dynamics of nuclear pore complex ortganization through the cell cycle. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16: 314-321.
• Sazer, S. 2005. Nuclear envelope: Nuclear pore complexity. Curr. Biol. 15: R23-R25.
• Schwartz, T. U. 2005. Modularity within the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15: 221-226.
• Tran, E. J. & Wente, S. R. 2006. Dynamic nuclear pore complexes: Life on the edge. Cell 125: 10411053.
• Wozniak, R. & Clarke, P. R. 2004. Nuclear pores: Sowing the seeds of assembly on the chromatin landscape. Curr. Biol. 13: R970-R972.

Nuclear Matrix and Lamina

• Bridger, J. M., Foeger, N., Kill, I. R. & Herrmann, H. 2007. The nuclear lamina. Both a structural framework and a platform for genome organization. FEBS J. 274: 1354-1361.
• Dorner, D., Gotzmann, J. & Foisner, R. 2007. Nucleoplasmic lamins and their interaction partners LAP2a, Rb, and BAF, in transcriptional regulation. FEBS J. 274: 1362-1373.
• Houben, F., Ramaekers, F. C. S., Snoeckx, L. H. E. H. & Broers, J. L. V. 2007. Role of nuclear lamina-cytoskeleton interactions in the maintenance of cellular strength. BIochim. BIophys. Acta 1773: 675-686.
• Mattout, A., Dechat, T., Adam, S. A., Goldman, R. D. & Gruenbaum, Y. 2006. Nuclear lamins, diseases and aging, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18: 335-341.
• Pederson, T. & Aebi, U. 2005. Nuclear actin extends, with no contraction in sight. Mol. Biol. Cell. 16: 5055-5060.
• Rusiñol, A. E. & Sinensky, M. S. 2006. Franesylated lamins, progeroid syndromes and farnesyl transferase inhibitors. J. Cell Sci. 119: 3265-3272.
• Zastrow, M. S.., Vicek, S. & Wilson, K. L. 2004. Proteins that bind A-type lamins: integrating isolated clues. J. Cell Sci. 117: 979-987.