Return to Forensic Home Page || Return to Table of Contents
Case Name: PEOPLE of California v. Donald Lee SHIRLEY
Date, Location, Cite: 1982 CA
31 Calif 3rd 18
Ca Supreme Court
The testimony of a hypnotized witness is not generally admissible; relied on HURD, but felt that hypnosis is not even generally recognized as being at all accurate.
cf Rock v. Arkansas
(This case is fun to read, because the people are straight out of a soap-opera)