research profile of US physics departments at the end of the 20th century

Research Profile of US Physics Departments at the end of the 20th Century with trends of the last decade noted




1990 faculties
tot
sub
sup
astr
ave tot
3986
1577
1922
477
32.9
fraction
0.40
0.48
0.12
1999 faculties
tot
sub
sup
astr
ave tot
3980
1605
2015
361
32.9
fraction
0.40
0.51
0.09


1990 faculties
1992 NRC:
top 30
next 31
next 30
next 30
Nsup ave
18.3 ±9.7
17.9 ±6.6
13.8 ±5.2
13.4 ±5.4
Nsub ave
23.6 ±7.4
14.5 ±7.2
9.8 ±5.0
4.2 ±3.4
Nast ave
6.2 ±5.3
3.7 ±3.4
3.8 ±4.4
2.0 ±2.6
(Nsub/Nsup) av
2.02
0.96
0.86
0.41
1999 faculties
1992 NRC:
top 30
next 31
next 30
next 30
Nsup ave
19.3 ±7.8
17.5 ±5.9
13.3 ±4.3
13.5 ±4.3
Nsub ave
22.9 ±8.4
14.8 ±7.3
10.5 ±4.9
4.8 ±3.2
Nast ave
5.6 ±4.8
2.4 ±2.3
2.3 ±3.1
1.6 ±2.2
(Nsub/Nsup) av
1.68
0.98
0.90
0.42


data from AIP Directory of Physics Faculties, 1989/90, 1990/91, 1998/99
data assembled in compare.bas 11-07-1999

We have considered 121 of the top departments (replacing a few by the next lower departments as noted below.) The four groupings considered here correspond approximately to the top four quintiles of the NRC ratings.

We have counted only the primary physics or physics and astronomy department in each university. Separate Astronomy departments or auxiliary physics departments are not included. Akron and Stevens Tech are omitted from these tables since they did not present faculty listings in the directories consulted.

Rms deviations from the mean are given as an estimate of distribution widths. Counting errors are expected to be much less than the rms deviations.

Six ranked departments gave up their PhD program between 1992 and 1999.

Thirty four departments not ranked in the 1992 NRC survey are now listed as having PhD programs. These more than compensate for the slight loss of faculty indicated for the programs in the tables here.

The average ratio of subatomic physics to superatomic physics is dominated among the top schools by Rockefeller University in the 1990 data although we have arbitrarily decreased their subatomic faculty by one and increased their superatomic faculty by one to regularize the average.

Perhaps a quick overview of the trends of the last decade can be had by plotting the ratio of subatomic physicists to superatomic physicists in the top N physics departments as a function of N. The new PhD programs in the 1999 AIP directory that were not present in the 1995 NRC rankings were alphabetically assigned a rank below the currently ranked departments. For the most part these are relatively small programs which do not significantly affect the integrated faculty numbers. Again one should be cautioned that the 1999 faculty ratios are compared with the 1995 rankings. Changes in the rankings could be expected to occur in response to changes in departmental research profiles.

It is also interesting to compare the top ten states in public support of physics with the subatomic ratio in their publicly supported PhD programs.