
Writing Comments That Lead to Learning
October, 2009
By Susan M. Taylor, Andrew University, MI

Instructors
who require papers spend a good deal of time emphasizing the importance
of audience and purpose in writing. Writers who remember their readers
and their writing objectives are much more likely to use good judgment
about the decisions that go into creating an effective piece of
writing. This is equally true of the comments instructors write on
students’ papers. I’d like to share some suggestions, some of which I
learned the hard way.
Students often react first to the number
of comments on the paper. They look to see how much the instructor
“bled” on their papers. They may not even read overall comments that
appear at the end. Sometimes it helps to put those comments up front so
that students see them first.
Notes in the margins of the papers
tend to be sketchy. With little room in the margins, instructors use
more underlining, coding, and abbreviating. Many marginal notes simply
label a problem without further explanation or example. For instance, I
have written, “There are stronger works for your POV” on papers not
thinking that POV (for point of view) may be an unfamiliar acronym. Not
only does this feedback puzzle and frustrate students, it doesn’t help
them improve.
There is a difference between an explanation
that simply shows the students how to reword or rewrite something and
an in-depth explanation that discusses the reasoning behind the
suggested change. For example, in a legal brief for my Business Law
class, a student wrote, “This is an appeal from the judgment of the St.
Joseph County Superior Court, by a jury, that the defendant was guilty
of check forgery.” After having spent so much time on the papers that
my hand ached, I gave into writer’s cramp and simply underlined “the
judgment” and “by the jury.” Fortunately, the student came to me and
asked what I meant.
On one of my first papers (when my hand was
fresh and cramp free), I wrote, “Watch your language. A jury convicts
or acquits but cannot render a judgment. The court enters a judgment on
the jury’s verdict.” This comment is a more useful explanation.
Instructors
must balance the positive and negative comments, remembering the
importance of positive feedback. It motivates students, is essential to
improvement, and builds confidence. If students are told why something
is good, they can do more of it subsequently. Papers lacking any
positive feedback tend to lead to poor student morale.
Closely
related is the overall tone of the comments. Instructors need to keep
the tone professional. Constructive criticism goes a long way, but
destructive criticism goes an even longer way. Once someone destroys
your self-confidence as a writer, it is almost impossible to write well.
How
many is too many? Instructors should monitor the number of comments
they write on students’ papers. Although it may be tempting to comment
on everything, the workload quickly becomes intolerable and too much
feedback may overwhelm the students. They find it difficult to
prioritize the comments and tend to retreat into simple and safe
writing in an effort to avoid another barrage of comments. Or they
don’t even read the comments and therefore learn nothing from the
feedback. However, the major problem with the overcommented paper is
that the instructor has lost both a sense of focus and a point of view.
The
solution is to separate the mechanical comments and the substantive
comments. The mechanical comments encourage the student to see the
paper as a fixed piece that just needs some editing. The substantive
comments, however, suggest that the student still needs to develop the
meaning by doing more research.
When commenting on students’
papers, think of your audience and your purpose. Your job as an
instructor is to reach your students to help them learn and grow. If
your comments do not accomplish your goal, then it doesn’t matter how
much time and effort you put into the papers.
Contact Susan M. Taylor at tsusan@andrews.edu.

Copyright © 2009 Magna Publications. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.